No, Paula, me posting a link to a Holmseth article does not constitute an "attack" on you, nor does it constitute anything coordinated. This is a social media platform. We post articles here. Duh.
If you hadn't attacked my Twitter account I wouldn't have noticed you, or cared, because to me you are not terribly notable. You brought my attention on yourself, by being inappropriate. You posted my work on your Twitter, and then turned around and you attacked my Twitter for posting the same content that you posted. Then you created a fake account with your old Twitter handle and posting my book cover on it with a picture of Czebotar, and you linked my book to that fake Twitter account. Impersonating people IS against Twitter rules. For that, I believe you should be thrown off Twitter.
I think you're projecting when you say I'm afraid. The question is, why? Why would you say I'm afraid, when I have absolutely zero to be afraid of? All I have done is get interested in someone's story, and I've looked into it. There's nothing illegal, immoral or wrong with that. For that, however, I've been the brunt of endless nasty comments about my name, my "investigative" ability, my writing, my spelling, and so much more I can't even remember it all from your cronies, and then from you when you deemed my posts inappropriate for public consumption.
YOU attacked me, not the other way around. Trying to play that I'm attacking you is pure, unadulterated BS.
You got my attention, and now you're trying to rewrite history like I'm a bad guy. For what? For getting interested in a subject? For trying and failing to read the illegible photos that were posted? That's a take on things that just makes you look desperate. Are you feeling slighted because I never answered your screaming Tweets that THEY WEREN'T 12 YEARS OLD? I didn't answer it for a really good reason. Have you figured out why, yet?
You want your spies in here to bring everything to you that I post so you can repost it on your Telegram pages? Go for it. Maybe the people in your Telegram rooms will get some education into how to have a discussion with someone while not calling them names. Have you noticed yet how I haven't had to call you names, misspell your name, add "grift" to the end, or insult your intelligence like you do constantly to me?
I also don't have to lie about you. Just pointing out the obvious about you is enough to make you go a little bonkers. And yet you lie about me, you lie about what I'm doing, and you lie about what I've done. I haven't yet found out a thing that you've posted related to me yet that didn't contain one or more lies.
Is that why you're afraid, because I don't have to lie about you to make you uncomfortable? I just point out the obvious, which is that you're mixed up in some weird stuff. Abnormal stuff. And you don't like having the light shone on your actions, or your Twitter account.
You're dreaming if you think that pointing out the obvious about your actions--that you yourself bragged on multiple social media platforms about--is a "ferocious attack". Get a grip. You can brag about it but I can't write about it? I don't do double standards. You attacked me. I didn't attack you, I simply pointed out that you attacked me. If you thought you could attack me, brag about it and I wasn't going to notice, you made a miscalculation. Nobody with half a brain believes your narrative that you're being attacked by me. From my vantage point it makes you look emotionally unstable and slightly desperate. Is that what you're going for?
Hello all you Telegrammers. Hope you found this scintillating. I wonder if Paula will be brave enough to post all of it. Or maybe like the last time she will have to inappropriately edit it so that it doesn't say what it actually says.
